If a Senate report is signed unanimously by one party and rejected unanimously the other, it's a good bet. If that report makes clear that the committee did not talk to anyone at the agency critiqued (and accused of torture) by the report, then it's all but certain.
The proper punishment for Senatress Feinstein and the Democrats on the committee is, of course, waterboarding. The problem is, of course, that the result of waterboarding is in general confusion, and the Democrats are showing plenty of that these days without being subjected to "enhanced interrogation." Who would notice the difference?
Another example; Jonathan Goober (oops, Gruber) has apparently been caught on tape saying the very things he denied in sworn testimony before Congress. Just like I said. Or, like I said elsewhere, what exactly does it take before a professor loses tenure? Lying for fun and profit is not supposed to be protected behavior, and it got Ward Churchill removed at Colorado.
Finally, apparently in the NFL, it's OK if you knock your girlfriend unconscious--the same injury that is suspected in many suicides of former football players--but if you leave bruises on your son during discipline, that's completely wrong. Not excusing AP here, but seriously....?
....are that the Congressman investigating this scandal are being way too nice to him. Yes, they've got him nailed to the wall, as they should, but if it were me doing the questioning, I'd simply point out that, as a Congressman, I agree that he was telling the truth in those videos. Calling something a tax is a great way to get a bill killed, as is admitting the real costs of a policy. Congress routinely (e.g. HIDA) banks on stupidity and ignorance to get bills passed. It is not an accident that no time was allotted for reading and debate prior to the vote for HIDA/Obamacare.
Recognizing these facts, and recognizing his status as an MIT professor who gained millions by doing HIDA consulting, I would proceed to reject his claim that he was just satisfying his vanity, and ask him why he didn't take action, knowing that the arguments made for HIDA (no tax, low cost, nobody loses coverage, etc..) were a complete line of....nonsense.
It's almost like they're coddling him because they don't want to learn the real truth.
A while back, I commented on a wonderful book called The Millionaire Next Door, which explored the realities of wealth in America. Most press was put into the reality that the truly rich generally don't drive high end luxury cars, don't wash their caviar with top flight champagne every night, don't inherit their wealth, and don't live in the toniest neighborhoods. Rather, they are in general entrepreneurs who make a point of saving a portion of their income to build financial security. It is, more or less, a secular version of what Dave Ramsey teaches.
There is another part of what Stanley and Danko write about, however, and that's that most of these entrepreneurs don't earn their wealth in flashy ways. They are plumbers, shopkeepers, dentists, electricians, and the like.
What unites them in their professions is not tools or skills, with the notable exception of one skill; they develop relationships. And to that point, here's an interesting big from The Art of Manlinesspointing out the criticality of building relationships that are deep as opposed to wide. If you fail at this, good luck making a small town business work, and that's where most of us live--even New York City is divided into neighborhoods served by small businessmen.
And it strikes me that this is a big crisis confronting the church. My pastor last weekend noted that there is a huge problem when the pastor--celebrity or otherwise--becomes the sole point of contact. This is, in a nutshell, why Mars Hill in Seattle dissolved so quickly. Without Mark Driscoll, it simply didn't make any sense, and it's worth noting that people left quickly--it was not only a single point of contact, but it was a casual, and not a deep, contact.
And along those lines, take note of passages like Colossians 4:7-11, where Paul specifically mentions others in their relationship with the church. In other words, Paul is making sure that the Colossian church is connected to someone else besides him. We should take note of the same.
Per my earlier comment, it appears that the problems at the University of Michigan go far, far deeper than Brady Hoke. How so? Well, apparently they're recruiting their new football coach from.....traditional powerhouse doormat Duke (and got rejected!), and they've just dropped two games to Eastern Michigan and New Jersey Institute of Technology. Oddly, it seems that NJIT shirts are being shipped to a lot of the same addresses where Appalachian State t-shirts were shipped in 2007. Go figure.
Seriously, I'm hoping that Jim Harbaugh gets the job, as it would be really good for Michigan and the Big 10 as a whole. The trick is whether they'd let him get rid of the general studies program that is the shame of Michigan athletics, and would they give him a few years to get excellent players who can also read.
I'm guessing no, but if it happens, it could put a lot of pressure on my alma mater to curtail some of the "comm arts" majors taken almost solely by athletes. And they need the help, as the state of scholarship there is such that feminist groups are calling for George Will to be uninvited because.....he questioned statistics and methods related to the issue of sexual assault. Good to know that Michigan State is doing such a good job teaching people how to think. Sigh.
We were discussing Gideon's destruction of his father's shrines to Ba'al and Asherah as a family last night, and my children not illogically suggested cutting down all the trees (Asherah is said by many to have been worshipped in sacred groves in the same way that Druids and Teutonic pagans did) to prevent this. My response;
The poor trees didn't do anything to deserve a bunch of naked pagans dancing around them.
Somehow my kids thought that was a pretty funny picture. So if anyone tells you that reading God's Word as a family is boring, think again. And as people who have lived around Boulder could tell you, it's not just Gideon who has the opportunity to cut down sacred groves infested by naked pagans.
....Madison, St. Paul, Lincoln, College Park, State College, Evanston, and probably even Iowa City, Bloomington, West Lafayette, Champaign-Urbana, and Piscataway. Not to mention Crawfordsville, where the Little Giants were hoping to get a big payday playing the stinky weasels. Why so?
Our favorite Michigan football coach ever, Brady Hoke, has been fired. Let's all hope that blue can get another coach to do as well as Hoke and Rich Rodriguez did there. Word has it that this was sung at his firing:
Hail to the Unabomber's school where the students smoke and drool Hail to Michigan, 4-20 hash fest!
hail to the Unabomber's school where the profs smoke and drool Hail to Michigan, the weenies of the West!
Well, at least those are lyrics, cleaned up a touch, a little like those we'd sing in East Lansing and Columbus. Go get 'em, General Studies majors from the "Harvard of the Midwest." If Harvard were known for a 50% graduation rate for their football team, and half of those with degrees which are completely worthless, that is.
Brad details an egregiously stupid comment made by the head of the St. Paul Government Schools--more or less, she asked what she was going to tell her black students about the situation. The police union responded--showing, I'm afraid, some ill fruits of their membership having attended schools like St. Paul Public in their diction--and I'm afraid also missed a golden chance to educate. Here's how I would have responded:
You tweeted an interesting question regarding the grand jury decision not to indict Officer Wilson of the Ferguson Police in the death of Michael Brown; what does one tell black students in this case? Well, our position is that it would be wise for teachers to simply tell the truth, and here's how we'd phrase it.
"The grand jury decided after 200 hours of deliberation that Officer Wilson was justified in shooting Michael Brown because Mr. Brown had committed aggravated assault with likely intent to kill, including the attempted theft of Officer Wilson's service pistol. They have released all of the information on which they based this decision, and it's worth noting that 90% of the information came from blacks at the scene, and that almost all of them agreed that Michael Brown had committed aggravated assault with likely intent to kill. This is, by the way, the same thing that got Trayvon Martin killed. Kids, I'm going to be very blunt with you; there are times in school where you may have gotten away with having a fight, even a fight where the loser needed to go to the hospital. However, when you get out in the real world, your victim does not know that you are going to stop "once you've made your point." When you start punching him--especially if you are much larger and male--your victim will assume that you are intending to kill or maim him. And that, under the law, allows your victim to respond to your likely lethal force with lethal force, whether he is a police officer or not. So choose your behaviors wisely, again, especially if you are large, athletic, and male."
See, that's not so difficult, is it? Moreover, as we look at the crime rates from students in and graduates of the schools you run, it's pretty obviously a lesson that many of these kids need to learn. So let's give it a try, OK?
No, I'm not going to blame the media here, though Mitch does a good job of that here and here. Rather, I'd like to build on what Powerline notes here and here; that if one looks at the footage from the media and ignores the reporters and commentariat, it appears not that people are rioting because they are enraged at the grand jury, but rather because the system is set up to reward those who riot, at least if they're the right skin color.
Take a look at the reports; people are prying up bricks from walkways and buildings to throw at police. They are destroying businesses that serve them and looting them. Vehicles on the streets are being overturned and burned. What are they saying with this, besides "I am a criminal."?
They are saying "This is not mine.". In other words, the rioters have no sense of ownership or belonging in the community where they live.
Now look at the proposals to help the situation. Someone should come from outside and reform the police. Someone will come from outside and provide jobs, housing, educational opportunities.....
.....and thus reinforce the lesson; "This is not mine, but I can get what I want when I make a stink.". If we really want to help, we need to make sure that help has a very clear message:
....I have been, as time permits, reviewing the book of Psalms to see a little bit more of what I'd discussed earlier; that it seems that the Psalms utilize more complex thoughts than even most hymns, and that they tend to lead with the "facts on the ground" about God's provision, nature, and such, and then let emotion flow from that. Just the opposite of what one would figure reading "Vertical Church" by a friend of Mark Driscoll's, really. We can also infer a little bit about what Temple music would look like from modern interpretations in Hebrew, infer a beat and physical movement with music from some of the Psalms, and even remember that strictly speaking, music is not worship.
To learn what it is, however--besides the obvious category of "praise" that one would infer from all of those Halleluiahs (praise y'all the Lord) in the Psalms and elsewhere--let's take a look at Ephesians 5:19.
addressing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody to the Lord with your heart, 20 giving thanks always and for everything to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ Notice here that we are to address, or speak to, one another in three (?) types of music. OK, so we're not bound to just the Psalms, and whatever we do, we "speak" to one another. Some kind of information is being imparted, and hence I would affirm that the song ought to (a) contain some theological information and (b) ought to convey it clearly--no coffee shop mumbling or heavy metal screaming a la Hillary ClintonBrian Johnson, please.
We can infer from the second phrase of Ephesians 5:19 that believers ought to join in the singing, and that the melody ought to be somehow in our hearts. Hopefully this is not too much of a stretch, but a "melody in our hearts" can imply both that the Scripture resonates in our hearts, and that the way the song is formulated is winsome--it is poetically and musically good. It ought to have some discerning marks in meter, rhyme, alliteration and the like, it ought to have a decent tune (no amelodic hymns, please), and the presentation of the song (hymn, Psalm) ought to be appropriate and memorable.
What seems very clear is that James MacDonald's prescriptions for music are pretty much dead wrong. It should convey theological content, is not as a rule repetitive or simple, there is no restriction on the grammatical person therein, and in light of the range of topics presented in Psalms, it doesn't as a rule need to lend it self to physical movement. Imagine, for example, trying to dance to "When I Survey the Wondrous Cross." It is, like many of the Psalms and Lamentations on the fall of Jerusalem, solemn.
Or, to address the final part of MacDonald's "Vertical Church" prescriptions for music, "When I Survey" builds its emotional value off the horror and awe that we ought to see when we consider ourselves in the shadow of the Cross--and does not need to be "emotive" in its wording because it is already powerful in its content.
In short, I would argue that those who would write, or perform, music in the church can do little better than to--beyond learning the Scriptures and possibly even hearing or reciting the Psalms in the original Hebrew--learn the depth and breadth of good music and poetry, including secular sources. Read Ben Johnson, the Bard, Frost, and others to get a "feel" for powerful poetry. Listen to a variety of music to get a "feel" for powerful music--concentrate especially on the music which is notable enough to be remembered on the "oldies" stations and such. You may quickly see what dreck is being pushed on us from many of the sources you may be hearing at church and elsewhere.
.....or a couple. For starters, this move by the President is in a way only doing what the INS/ICE and previous Presidents have been doing for decades; ignoring the problem. The only real innovation is that he is going to illegally hand out work permits.
But that said, I reckon that if I told my employer that I was not only not going to do my job, but was going to prevent my coworkers from doing theirs, my manager would promptly let me know that I was welcome to resign my position or be fired. I'll be sending such a note to the President, as well as my Senators and representative. I am, as a citizen and taxpayer, their employer, and if they're not going to do their job, they are welcome to resign or be fired.
Regarding the specifics of the plan, Hugh Hewitt makes some guesses, and (as is typical for the President), it turns out that his plan will hurt those who are not here legally. The trick is that the fraudulent documents Mr. Obama plans to hand out to illegals will.....
.....clearly identify them as what they are. As such, employers who don't want a hassle from angry neighbors for hiring illegals won't hire them, and illegals won't want a clear paper trail to exist when (God willing) we get a law-abiding President in 2017.
In other words, President Obama is about to do for the Constitution and the immigration issue what he's done for the rule of law in taxes and healthcare. God help us.
One question that comes to mind regarding Jonathan Gruber's "paid to obfuscate" testimony regarding the Health Insurance Deform Act, a.k.a. "Obamacare", is what consequences Gruber and his minions and cronies ought to face for more or less deceiving the public to get HIDA passed.
For my part, it is my opinion that tenure ought to protect the right of professors to investigate unpopular areas and propagate their sincerely held views, but that it ought not protect those who use their credentials to lie for political gain. There is a place for ethics requirements in academia, and there ought not be a place in academia for liars like Jonathan Gruber.
Well, the good news is that it's extremely unlikely that my Spartans will be humiliated in the NCAA playoff this season. :^) Well done, Buckeyes.
The bad news is that activists in Ferguson, MO, have released a list of 19 demands that, if agreed to, will make the situation a lot more dangerous when the grand jury conclusion in the Michael Brown case (all but expected to exonerate the police officer) is released. Here's the list for reference.
What's wrong with it? Here you go:
Demand #3 is that advance notice will be given--OK, 48 hours to prepare for a riot. What could possibly go wrong?
Demand #4 is that the rioters be informed of the police chain of command--"Hey Honey, have a nice time while I'm at work. By the way, the rioters know who and where you are."
Demands #7 and #8 are that the police not wear riot gear, use rubber bullets or tear gas, or use crowd control equipment. OK, if I'm an officer and do not have crowd/riot control equipment, and I'm faced with a possibly lethal situation, what tool on my belt do I use? Hint; it's not the nightstick, the flashlight, or the Taser.
Demand #9 is that the police not interfere with the communications of the protesters--because it's not like rioters have ever coordinated to create a much more dangerous result, is it?
Demand #10 is for individual arrests and not bulk arrests. Because apparently the police have never faced a situation that became more dangerous because people refused to disperse, which is a crime.
Demand #11 is for "safe houses" so the rioting leaders can run the riots without interference from the police. Um, say what?
Put bluntly, if I wanted to get a bunch of these protesters killed, I don't know that I could do any better than to release these recommendations. Are we sure it was civil rights protesters, and not a local KKK chapter, that came up with this?
Now as much as I hope that Harry Reid gives up his position, and as much as I think it's likely today, here is my somewhat pessimistic prediction for the outcome of the elections today at the national level. Whether the GOP wins the Senate or not, the President is a consummate politician with the media in his back pocket and guarding him well. As others have noted, if only the Secret Service were that good.
Hence, my prediction is that whatever gains are made, they will be stymied by Mr. Obama. The Democrats will stymie attempts to vote on repealing Obamacare, as there is little chance the GOP will take a filibuster-proof majority there, and even if a vote is taken, the bill will be vetoed by the President.
The most I am hoping for is a slowing in the rate of growth of government, and perhaps a slight roadblock for the worst of Mr. Obama's judicial and other nominees. Real progress will have to wait for national repentance for the debacle of Barry Soetoro and 2016.
I just gotta say that I love Coach Hoke. Michigan should keep him for a long, long time if he keeps this up. Spartans for Hoke! And Buckeyes! And Gophers! And....Scarlet Knights? If it keeps going this way, they're going to be playing the Little Giants again soon.
OK, seriously, lest I be accused of total Schadenfreude, let it be noted that Rich Rodriguez is 6-1 at Arizona this year. He's doing great with a school that hasn't traditionally been first tier in the PAC-10, and this raises the question of whether someone has "put a spike" into the University of Michigan's ability to put a good football team on the field. Is that je ne sais quoi lost?
And I've also got to admit that, looking at the game pictures, many of the MSU players are true physical specimens. I am hoping that this indicates great recruiting and great training, and not the kind of steroid nonsense that the George Perles teams that Tony Mandarich played on were known for.