Wednesday, January 07, 2009

Getting started with homeschooling

Terry notes that part of the fun of starting home education is to be concerned about whether one is reading enough, too much, or just the right amount. So I figure it might be helpful to some to list some books my family has been blessed by.

Our journey into homeschooling was prompted by Douglas Wilson's Recovering the Lost Tools of Learning. Built on Dorothy Sayers' "The Lost Tools of Learning," it describes really the first half of classical education, the Trivium, and why it's important. (Sayers' talk can be obtained for free, just google it) That led to books such as Wise & Bauer's The Well Trained Mind and the Bluedorn family's Teaching the Trivium. If you've guessed that I consider it crucial for students to learn their Latin & Logic, you guessed right. I do hope that in the future, homeschooling authors give a little bit more time to the "Quadrivium" of arithmetic, geometry, astronomy, and music. The movement is currently a little "Tri-heavy," methinks.

Also of interest are the works of Charlotte Mason. While Miss Mason gave more credence to Darwin and modern psychology than I do, she wonderfully elucidates the reasons why institutional schools so often fail to educate children, centering on the reality that they are not simply "young skulls full of mush" to be filled.

Can one read too little? Yes, I think that many who simply try to establish a standard school at home fall into this trap. They often order a different curriculum every year, unaware that by changing educational styles, they're confusing their kids. Can one read too much? If you're understanding what you're reading, you probably won't fall into this trap. Starting with a few good books like those listed above will tend to give a parent a "garbage detector" that will result in putting down useless books after reading only the introduction. You'll be ready to have fun with your children as you lead them in the joy that is learning instead.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

There might be one "reading too much" trap -- where you're in the fruitless pursuit of the perfect curriculum, and year after year read yet another new thing that "inspires" you to try something new in the hope that it's just a little bit better than what you're doing now. If something is working for you, in the sense of achieving what you want to achieve, even if not perfectly, don't tinker too much.

Bike Bubba said...

You would be correct to suggest that yes, that "if" in "if you're understanding what you're reading" can be a pretty big "if". :^)

Seriously, I'd put that (and I've sadly seen it) in the bin of "no coherent philosophy of education."

Anonymous said...

It's not necessarily a lack of coherent philosophy (though I can see that would be a common reason for the problem.) I have a friend who has a pretty definite philosophy, but she's always on after the next "new" thing she can use to do it "even better." Fortunately, she's cautious enough in what she actually implements (and affluent enough) that it mostly results in a lot of bought, but unused, curriculum lying around her house, and not too much instability in what she actually winds up doing.

Elspeth said...

"Recovering the Lost Tools of Learning" sounds like something I might want to read. Thanks for suggesting it.

Bike Bubba said...

I highly recommend it; and if cost is an issue, I recommend downloading Sayers' talk for free.

http://www.gbt.org/text/sayers.html